This Web page has been archived on the Web.
Performance Report—For the period ending 31 March 1998
Section I—Message from the Auditor General
Section II—Overview of the Office
Mandate, Roles and Responsibilities
Enabling Legislation
Activity
The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
The OAG Vision and Mission
Organization of the Office
Reporting Our Work
Section III—Office Performance
A. Performance Expectations
Chart of Key Results Commitments
B. Performance Accomplishments, by OAG Business Line Components
Performance
Parliamentary Activities
Response to our Observations and Recommendations
Audit Project Hour Ratio
Unintended Effects
C. Sustainable Development Performance
D. Key Reviews
Scrutiny of Office Operations
E. Year 2000 Compliance
Section IV—Financial Summary Tables
Section V—Supplementary Information
A. Listing of Statutory Reports
B. Contacts for Further Information
Section I—Message from the Auditor General
We are committed to promoting answerable, honest and productive government. Through independent audits and examinations we provide Parliament with objective information, advice and assurance. From this work, Parliament can hold government to account for its stewardship of public funds. This Performance Report describes the extent to which we have delivered on our commitment.
The Office of the Auditor General is having an impact by contributing in a number of different ways to securing accountability and promoting value for money across the federal government. Our value-for-money work quite often leads to improvements in government operations. For instance, we identified opportunities to generate several millions in potential annual interest revenue for the government by depositing taxpayer receipts more promptly. As a result, changes to the practices and procedures surrounding these deposits have already been undertaken.
The issues we tackle invariably require action and commitment by others. For instance, our government-wide audit on preparedness for the Year 2000 gave parliamentarians a more complete picture of the extent of the problem and its urgency. Our work has resulted in an accelerated effort by the Treasury Board Secretariat and departments to aggressively manage the problem.
Our annual audit of the financial statements of the Government of Canada adds to the credibility and understandability of the information provided in them. Unfortunately, in 1996-97 I expressed a qualified opinion on the statements because we had reservations about the information they presented. Our reservation stemmed from the fact that the government had departed from objective accounting standards and its own accounting standards in preparing these financial statements. A recent study undertaken by our Office called Parliament's attention to these problems.
In our Performance Report last year, we established cost targets to reduce the expenditures on our own audit activities. Overall, the Office has been successful in its efforts to deliver products of the same quality at costs below the established targets.
Our performance is often measured by the actions of others: our work influences change that others are responsible for implementing. Sometimes we are successful at influencing change; other times we are not. For example, in our chapter on Human Resources Development Canada's transition toward results-based management, we indicated that parliamentarians would be in a better position to serve taxpayers if they had access in one single document to information on both the performance and the financial components of the Employment Insurance Account. So far, the government has decided not to implement our recommendation. We will pursue and report on these issues in our regular follow-up work and our future Performance Reports. I am convinced that there is a potential for additional savings and further improvements in the government's accountability if more of our recommendations are implemented, or implemented more quickly.
Through conformance with professional standards, a highly skilled and multidisciplinary staff, adherence to an internal quality management system and the parliamentary interest that our work generates, we can assist in promoting accountability within the government. I believe we have been successful in delivering on our commitment.
L. Denis Desautels, FCA
Auditor General of Canada
Section II—Overview of the Office
Mandate, Roles and Responsibilities
Enabling Legislation
1. The Auditor General Act, the Financial Administration Act and a variety of other acts and orders-in-council set out the duties of the Auditor General and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development as they relate to legislative auditing and monitoring of federal departments and agencies, Crown corporations, territorial governments and other national and international organizations.
Activity
2. The principal activity of the Office is legislative auditing. Put simply, the Auditor General is required to provide Parliament and the Canadian people with answers to the following questions about the Office's activities:
Legislative Auditing
| Components of our business line1 | Provides Parliament and the Canadian people with answers to the following questions: |
|---|---|
| Attest audit of the Financial Statements of the Government of Canada | Is the government presenting fairly its overall financial situation? |
| Annual audits of Crown corporations and other entities | Are Crown corporations and other entities presenting their financial information fairly and complying with relevant legislative authorities? |
| Value-for-money audits of departments and agencies | Were departmental and agency programs run economically and efficiently, and with due regard to their environmental effects? Does the government have the means to measure the effectiveness of programs? Is legislation complied with and the public purse protected? |
| Special examinations of Crown corporations | Do systems and practices of Crown corporations provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, resources are managed economically and efficiently, and operations are carried out effectively? |
| Environment and sustainable development monitoring activities | To what extent did departments meet the objectives and implement the plans set out in their sustainable development strategies laid before the House of Commons? |
| 1 In all our work, we also consider compliance with authorities. | |
3. We are different from departments and agencies by virtue of our independence from the government and our reporting relationship to Parliament. Our independence is assured by a broad legislative mandate, freedom from certain controls over our budget and staff, and a 10-year mandate for the Auditor General.
The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
4. The Commissioner's primary role and responsibility is to monitor, on behalf of the Auditor General, the sustainable development strategies and action plans of departments and the status of, and responses to, public petitions on environmental matters. The Commissioner is also required to report annually on the results of his work.
The OAG Vision and Mission
5. The Office's Strategic Framework, which was last updated in January 1998, includes our Vision and Mission Statements to guide the work of the Office.
Vision
We are committed to making a difference for the Canadian people by promoting, in all our work for Parliament, answerable, honest and productive government that reflects a commitment to sustainable development.
Mission
The Office of the Auditor General of Canada conducts independent audits and examinations that provide objective information, advice and assurance to Parliament. We promote accountability and best practices in government operations.
Objectives
We want to make a difference by promoting:- a fair and frank accounting of the government's stewardship of financial and other resources;
- efficiency and productivity in the public service;
- cost effectiveness in government activities;
- collection of revenues owed to the Crown;
- objective assurance on matters found to be satisfactory and unsatisfactory;
- compliance with authority;
- honesty in government; and
- environment and sustainable development.
- Help improve the government's finances and information on its financial condition.
- Stimulate advances in accountability concepts and improve accountability practices in government.
- Influence the quality of financial management in government.
- Contribute to necessary changes in the public service.
- Implement fully the role of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development.
6. We share these objectives with many other parties inside and outside government, which complicates the attribution of results to the audits we perform. Many share a commitment to good government, and it is often through their co-operation and participation that we effect change. We assess our own effectiveness in terms of our ability to conduct high-quality audits that address significant topics and contribute to making a difference, as described in Section III of this document.
Organization of the Office
(As of 1 September 1998)
7. The Executive Office provides overall policy direction, legal support, professional practice review and oversees our international activities.
8. The Corporate Services Branch provides direct support to the audit function.
9. The Audit Operations Branch is responsible for carrying out all the audit activities of the Office.
10. The Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development is responsible for monitoring and reporting on the progress of federal government departments toward promoting sustainable development in their operations. The Commissioner also assists the Auditor General in performing the duties of the Auditor General that relate to the environment and sustainable development.
11. The Office staff is multidisciplinary, with qualified accountants making up about 63 percent; another 23 percent have postgraduate degrees in other disciplines, including engineers, lawyers, statisticians, sociologists, historians, environmental specialists and economists; and 8 percent have both.
Reporting Our Work
12. The work of the Auditor General and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development is reported in several places and in several forms, pursuant to enabling legislation. The main outputs are the opinions on the financial statements of the Government of Canada and other entities, and chapters or audit notes in the Auditor General's periodic reports to Parliament, as well as special examination reports to boards of directors of Crown corporations. But our work could also result in special publications, methodology, briefings for parliamentary committees, speeches, and management letters.
Section III—Office Performance
A. Performance Expectations
13. The Office has set financial, efficiency and effectiveness targets for its operations. We have measured our performance against these targets in this section. (Exhibit 1)
Exhibit 1—Summary Financial Information Legislative Auditing
| Planning Spending | $50,688,000 |
| Total Authorities | $51,682,308 |
| 1997-98 Actuals | $51,448,236 |
The summary financial information presented in Exhibit 1 includes three figures. The three figures are intended to show:
|
|
Chart of Key Results Commitments
14. Exhibit 2 provides the chart of Key Results Commitments that was published in the 1998 Accounting for Results report of the President of the Treasury Board, Annex B(2) - Results Commitments for Officers of Parliament. It provides an overview of the key results that the Office would like to achieve.
Exhibit 2—Chart of Key Results Commitments (As published in the 1998 Accounting for Results report)
| To provide Parliament and Canadians with: | To be demonstrated by: | Achievement reported in: |
|---|---|---|
| independent audits and examinations that provide objective information, advice and assurance, and that promote accountability, best practices in government operations, and sustainable development | evidence that we follow professional standards, and that Parliament accepts and endorses our audit conclusions on matters found to be satisfactory or unsatisfactory
observations and recommendations that are implemented and result in demonstrable improvements in public sector management and service delivery |
See "Public Accounts Audit" |
15. We have expanded the above chart to provide more detail by which to measure our performance. Exhibit 3 summarizes the key results that the Office achieved in 1997-98 and indicates the components of our business line that helped to achieve them. The page references in the expanded chart indicate where in this document the key achievements in 1997-98 are reported.
Exhibit 3—Expanded Chart of Key Results Commitments
| To provide Parliament and Canadians with: | To be demonstrated by: | Indicators: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent audits and examinations that make a difference for Parliament and Canadians by promoting: | Opinion and Observations on the Financial Statements of the Government of Canada | Opinions on the financial statements of Crown corporations and other entities | Value-for-money audits of departments and agencies | Reports to boards of directors on special examinations of Crown corporations | Environment and sustainable development monitoring activities | |
| A fair and frank accounting of the government's stewardship of financial and other resources | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Public Accounts Audit, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Special Examinations, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Reliability and usefulness of information provided to Parliament and management for monitoring and decision-making purposes. | ||
| Efficiency and productivity in the public service | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Special Examinations, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Refers to opportunities to reduce costs or achieve more with resources provided. | |||
| Cost effectiveness in government activities | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Special Examinations, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | As above. | |||
| Collection of revenues owed to the Crown | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Increased effectiveness of revenue administration and maintenance of the tax base. | ||||
| Objective assurance on matters found to be satisfactory and unsatisfactory | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Public Accounts Audit, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Audits of Financial Statements of Crown Corporations and Others, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Demonstrated compliance with appropriate standards. | |||
| See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Public Accounts Audit, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Audits of Financial Statements of Crown Corporations and Others, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Demonstrated compliance with appropriate standards. | ||||
| See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Special Examinations, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Extent to which ministers and Crown corporation boards of directors found our special examination reports useful. | |||||
| Compliance with authorities | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Audits of Financial Statements of Crown Corporations and Others, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Extent to which parliamentarians, Crown corporation boards of directors and other users of our audit products were assured that operations were conducted in compliance with the relevant legislative framework, and the required rules and regulations. | |||
| Honesty in Government | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Contributions to reducing the risk of wrongdoing, conflict of interest and fraud, and to maintenance of sound ethics and values. | ||||
| Environment and sustainable development | See "Performance Outputs and Achievements from Environment and Sustainable Development, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998" | Amount of audit work carried out on the government's efforts in environmental issues and sustainable development strategies. | ||||
B. Performance Accomplishments, by OAG Business Line Components
Performance
16. Because of the nature of legislative auditing, our work influences change that others are responsible for implementing. Our effectiveness depends on our ability to conduct high-quality audits that address significant topics and contribute to "making a difference". For instance, our findings may result in debate about issues that affect the government's transparency and accountability. Management may implement more effective management practices. Parliament may increase its monitoring activity or seek advice and clarification through the committee process or in debate in the House of Commons. Central agencies may adopt new policies or change existing ones to improve management in specific government-wide areas. In other audits, our findings may confirm that the government's practices are economical, efficient and effective and that others could learn from them. In some cases, improvements in government operations are immediate; in other cases, corrective actions are carried out over a longer time frame - for instance, when legislative or policy changes are required. Crucial to the implementation of our recommendations is the support of parliamentarians - in particular, the Public Accounts Committee, and departments.
The performance accomplishments in 1997-98 for the five main components of the Office's business line are described below. At the end of this section we also discuss the unintended effects of our work.
Public Accounts Audit
17. Every year, the Auditor General expresses an opinion on the Financial Statements of the Government of Canada. For 1996-97, the Opinion of the Auditor General can be found in Section 1 of Volume 1 - 1997 Public Accounts of Canada. Exhibit 4 shows the actual costs and planned costs for future years of our work in this area. We had planned to spend $5 million in 1997-98 but have come below this target, at $4.2 million. The government has delayed the implementation of the key elements of its Financial Information Strategy (FIS). Because of reduced audit work in this area, our actual audit costs are below target.
Exhibit 4—Annual Audit of the Financial Statements of the Government of Canada - Annual Audit Costs

Performance Outputs and Achievements from Public Accounts Audit, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998
| Objectives and Effects | Key Outputs in 1997-98 | Key Achievements in 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Assurance | ||
|
Demonstrated compliance with appropriate standards. Extent to which parliamentarians and other users of financial statements found our audit opinions useful. Reliability and usefulness of information provided to Parliament and management for monitoring and decision-making purposes. |
|
Reliability of financial information
|
Audits of Financial Statements of Crown Corporations and Others
18. We audited the financial statements of parent Crown corporations, federal departmental corporations and other federal entities, territorial governments and organizations and other entities and expressed an opinion on the fairness of their financial statement presentation and their compliance with relevant legislative authorities.
19. We are making progress in reducing the costs of our annual audits through new audit methodology and the specialization of audit staff. Our goal by 1998-99 is to reduce audit costs by 15 percent of 1994-95 costs. Exhibits 5, 6 and 7 show planned and actual costs of our three financial audit activities; when their actual costs for 1997-98 are combined, they show a reduction of 16 percent from 1994-95. The actual costs shown in these graphs represent audit work in the same entities over the five-year period 1993-94 to 1997-98.
Exhibit 5—Costs of Annual Audits of Federal Crown Corporations
Exhibit 6—Costs of Annual Audits of Other Entities

Exhibit 7—Costs of Annual Audits of Territorial Governments, Agencies and Corporations

Performance Outputs and Achievements from Audits of Financial Statements of Crown Corporations and Others, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998
Value-for-Money Audits
20. As Exhibit 8 shows, value-for-money (VFM) audits have changed from 1993 and earlier, when their average cost was over $1 million each. We now carry out shorter, more focussed examinations of particular issues and we are paying closer attention to planning and managing the costs, timeliness and results of audits. We set a target of reducing the average cost of regular VFM audits to $750,000 by 1998. This does not include government-wide audits and studies, each of which is unique in scope and coverage. We reached our target in 1997 when the actual average cost of regular VFM audits was $711,000.
Exhibit 8—Average Cost of VFM Audits

Parliamentary Activities
21. Since our primary client is Parliament, to some extent we can also measure the impact of the Office's work by the level of parliamentary interest it generates. The hearings process provides some indication of the impact of our work. In 1997-98, the Public Accounts Committee held 29 meetings with OAG staff. Following those hearings, the Public Accounts Committee issued nine reports containing recommendations that primarily supported the main findings of our reports.
22. Other committees of the House and Senate frequently seek information and advice from us as well. The Office also appeared before other standing committees where our work was discussed, and we provided our views on specific subjects. For instance, because of the work done on the refugee claims process, we were able to assist the Citizenship Committee in its review of the process for removal of failed refugee claimants, and our work on the government's preparedness for Year 2000 assisted the Industry Committee in its review of the Year 2000 impact on businesses.
23. Our views were also sought on other topics such as Canada's energy efficiency program, ozone layer protection, the movement of hazardous wastes, federal contaminated sites, the federal government's preparedness for oil and chemical spills, First Nations health, performance measurement and reporting and The Atlantic Groundfish Strategy. During the year, about 53 percent of our reports were the subject of a hearing with the Public Accounts Committee and/or another parliamentary committee. This is our highest rate of coverage since 1994-95, when it was 65 percent.
| Parliamentary Committee Meetings | 1995-96 | 1996-97 | 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Public Accounts Committee meetings | 37 | 45 | 39 |
| Number of meetings in which the Office was asked to participate | 23 | 28 | 29 |
| Number of meetings with other committees of the House and the Senate in which the Office was asked to participate | 10 | 16 | 12 |
Response to our Observations and Recommendations
24. We follow up on the progress that has been made in response to the recommendations and observations in our value-for-money audit chapters, generally two years after the audits are reported. In the Auditor General's 1996 reports to the House of Commons and the reports in the preceding four years, we made a total of 892 observations and recommendations or other suggestions for major improvements. Based on our regular follow-up work and some further monitoring, we have been able to establish the extent of progress that has been made in response to 654 of these (information was not available for 129, and 109 will not be followed up until next year).
25. The results of our reviews in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 are presented in Exhibit 9 , which shows the status of observations and recommendations, and Exhibit 10, which shows the primary areas affected. The last column of Exhibit 9 shows that over the five years, 112 or 17 percent of observations and recommendations have been fully implemented and satisfactory progress is being made on 245 or 37 percent. Progress has not been satisfactory in the case of 171 or 26 percent of observations and recommendations. This is lower than the rate reported in previous years. We did some further analysis and found that observations and recommendations dealing with management systems and practices were the most problematic.
Exhibit 9—Status of Observations and Recommendations

Exhibit 10—Primary Areas of Observations and Recommendations

26. Included in the last column of Exhibit 9 are 150 observations and recommendations dealing with environmental and sustainable development issues. Eight percent of these have been fully implemented over the five-year period, and satisfactory progress has been made on an additional 27 percent. In 25 percent of cases, progress is not as fast as we would like; and 9 percent were bypassed by events.
Performance Outputs and Achievements from Value-for-Money Audits,for the Period Ended 31 March 1998
Improvements in the management of First Nations health program prompted by our value-for-money audit
Our October 1997 report to Parliament included a chapter entitled Health Canada - First Nations Health. It contained our conclusions on the Medical Services Branch of Health Canada, which is responsible for the program of health services to First Nations. There are about 1,800 people employed by the Branch and the activities covered by our audit represent approximately $1 billion in expenditures annually. The Branch's activities can impact on the health of approximately 640,000 status Indians and Inuit. Our last review of this Branch was undertaken in 1993.
The audit cost $793,000 to complete. Among other things, it included interviews with representatives of First Nations communities and various professional bodies. We analyzed a sample of 24 transfer agreements - representing 40 First Nations communities of different regions, sizes and degrees of isolation. We carried out extensive interviews with program managers at Medical Services Branch headquarters and selected regional offices, and we visited approximately 12 "points of service". In addition, we reviewed program documentation and related health literature. Throughout the audit we sought the advice of external advisors, a group of individuals carefully chosen for their expertise and knowledge of the subject matter.
The audit report illustrated that even though Health Canada had developed a transfer framework to allow First Nations to start managing their own health programs, not all elements of the framework had been implemented. For instance, we noted that program audits were insufficient. The objective of these audits is to inform Health Canada of the extent to which all conditions, both financial and non-financial, are being met. Also, the Department was not able to determine whether the program was having the desired effect, namely, an actual improvement in the health status of First Nations communities.
We also assessed those activities by the Branch that had not been transferred to First Nations. Through our audit we were able to document significant deficiencies in the management of non-insured health benefits, the result of which was that some clients had access to excessively high levels of prescription drugs. The Branch had been aware of this problem for almost 10 years, yet had been slow to intervene.
This report received extensive media coverage, reflecting the high degree of interest in this issue among Canadians.
Shortly after the release of the report, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) called a hearing with witnesses from our Office and Health Canada. The findings in our chapter formed the basis of the discussion. During this hearing, Health Canada expressed its commitment to improving its practices, and agreed to submit to the Committee its intended course of action on all of our recommendations. The Standing Committee on Health also called a hearing, with OAG staff members as witnesses. The report subsequently issued by the PAC and the responses given by the Department will assist us when we conduct our follow-up review of this program. Our follow-ups normally occur two years after the original audit.
Special Examinations
27. Crown corporations do not undergo a special examination every year but rather on a five-year cycle. The first cycle was conducted between 1984 and 1989 and the second was conducted between 1990 and 1995. The third cycle is currently under way and our planned average cost is $390,000, as shown in Exhibit 11. Costs are decreasing because of improved methodology and the experience obtained in previous cycles. The exhibit compares the average cost of the same special examinations by cycle.
Exhibit 11—Average Cost of Special Examinations by Cycle

28. The third round of examinations by the Office of 35 Crown parent corporations is under way and will be largely completed by the year 2000-01. In 1997-98 we reported on 5 corporations, namely: Cape Breton Development Corporation, Atlantic Pilotage Authority, Great Lakes Pilotage Authority, National Capital Commission and Farm Credit Corporation. The cost of completing these 5 examinations was 38 percent lower than in the previous cycle.
Performance Outputs and Achievements from Special Examinations, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998
Environment and Sustainable Development
Performance Outputs and Achievements from Environment and Sustainable Development, for the Period Ended 31 March 1998
| Objectives and Effects | Key Outputs in 1997-98 | Key Achievements in 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|
| Environment and Sustainable Development | ||
|
Amount of audit work carried out on the government's efforts in environmental issues and sustainable development strategies. |
|
Impact on the environment In our audits, we have covered a broad range of topics, from the government's initiatives to protect the ozone layer to its efforts at controling the movement of toxic wastes. Our tracking of references in the House of Commons and the Senate to the OAG's work on environmental issues shows an increase from last year. Our strategy to better inform parliamentarians about environmental issues seems to be having an impact. During this fiscal year, there has also been an increase in the number of parliamentary committee hearings dedicated to discussion of the issues presented in our audit reports. Both our Office staff and senior managers of the respective departments attended committee hearings as witnesses. Some of the issues debated in this forum included:
Two reports have been issued by parliamentary committees making use of our findings: Fisheries and Oceans Canada - Pacific Salmon: Sustainability of the Resource Base and Kyoto and Beyond: Meeting the Climate Change Challenge. As a result, Fisheries and Oceans officials will be establishing a schedule for regular reviews of its salmon habitat policies and practices and will report to parliamentarians on the results of those reviews. Encouraging good practices In a concerted effort to provide practical assistance to the government on sustainable development, we have attempted to "package" the knowledge we have gathered and disseminate it. For example, our chapters this year included 57 references to good management practices, compared with 15 in the previous year. Also, we have put together a series of workshops for departmental managers on the subject of performance indicators, and created a data base listing all international agreements and their features. We have also distributed a booklet on selected case studies. |
Audit Project Hour Ratio
29. The Audit Project Hour Ratio (APHR) calculates the percentage of available staff time that is used directly for audit activities. "Available staff time" takes into consideration any leave time taken (vacation, maternity, sick, etc.); the balance is available to fulfil the time needs (hours) of the Office. Taking into account various factors such as the need for training and the effects of stress and workload on our staff, we have determined that an acceptable APHR range would be between 70 and 80 percent for our Audit Operations Branch, as shown in Exhibit 13. In 1997-98, the actual ratio was within the target range.
Exhibit 13—Ratio of Audit Project Time to Net Available Time - Audit Operations Branch
Unintended Effects
30. We are always looking out for any unintended effects of our work. We try to avoid proposing the creation of unnecessary or excessive controls or systems, so that management in the organizations we audit can focus on priority issues.
31. In some cases, government organizations are undergoing significant changes and resource reductions. Implementing our recommendations could require additional entity resources. Any significant issues we raise can create additional pressures on resources and further affect staff morale.
32. As well, reported cases of mismanagement may have a negative effect on the public's confidence in the government. Despite this potential drawback, we believe that significant cases must continue to be reported.
C. Sustainable Development Performance
33. In Chapter 37 of the December 1997 Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons, we voluntarily presented a Sustainable Development Strategy for the Office with our goals, objectives, targets and key performance indicators. We are now in a position to report on our key achievements during 1997-98 (see Exhibit 12).
Exhibit 12—Sustainable Development Performance
| Sustainable Development Goals | Sustainable Development Objectives | Key Achievements in 1997/98 | Key Performance Indicators | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline 1996-97 |
1997-98 | ||||
|
In Audit Work: To promote sustainable development by:
|
|
Out of 20 activities scheduled for 1997-98, 6 were completed, 9 are in progress and 5 are left to do.
|
|
- |
not available (survey planned for 98) |
|
8% |
15% |
|||
|
- |
not available |
|||
|
12% fully implemented 55% satisfactory (1991-95) |
11% fully implemented 37% satisfactory (1992-96) |
|||
|
In Administrative Activities: To optimize the use of natural resources and to minimize the negative environmental impacts of the OAG's day-to-day operations. |
|
Out of 9 activities scheduled for 1997-98, 3 were completed, 5 are in progress and 1 is left to do.
Our target for 1998-99: 5% reduction compared to 1996-97. |
|
9,040/employee |
9,452/employee (5% increase) |
|
- |
not available (activity planned for 98/99) |
|||
|
In Human Resources: To support activities that recognize our employees as our greatest assets in pursuing our sustainable development goals. |
|
Out of 15 activities scheduled for 1997-98, 9 were completed, 2 are in progress and 4 are left to do.
|
|
- |
not available (planned for 98/99) |
|
- |
not available (planned for 98/99) |
|||
| Source: 1997-98 OAG Progress Report on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Strategy | |||||
D. Key Reviews
Scrutiny of Office Operations
34. As a professional auditing body, the Office is subject to professional and ethical standards. For this reason, in addition to being subject to examination by the profession, the Office has developed its own mechanisms to ensure that audit quality is maintained. Furthermore, the Office's operations are subject to examination by the Public Accounts Committee. The following table provides more information about the reviews carried out of the Office's operations.
List of Reviews Completed During the Year Ended 31 March 1998
| Study Title / Topic | Fiscal Year of Completion | Description / Significance of Review |
|---|---|---|
|
Independent financial audit of the Office of the Auditor General and issuance of an auditor's report |
1998 |
|
|
Provincial chartered accountants institutes/ordre practice inspection programs |
Periodic - depends on province |
|
|
OAG Quality Review Program |
Regularly |
|
|
OAG Quality Management System |
1998 |
|
|
1998-99 Estimates of the Office of the Auditor General - appearance before the Public Accounts Committee |
1998 |
|
E. Year 2000 Compliance
35. All internal Office mission-critical systems have been identified, analyzed, prioritized, and replaced or repaired if required. We are, of course, dependent on many other entities, including but not restricted to Public Works and Government Services Canada (payroll, invoice payment, accommodation, etc.) hydro, the national and international phone system, etc. We are monitoring the status of the efforts of these organizations.
36. We have spent $300,000 addressing this challenge. Between now and the year 2000, we will continue to monitor the situation, but we do not expect to incur any significant additional expenditures.
37. We are currently evaluating what form of contingency planning would be appropriate for our Office, given the nature of our work and the fact that we have already achieved compliance in our systems. We anticipate completing this evaluation, and developing contingency plans as appropriate, by the end of 1998-99.
Section IV—Financial Summary Tables
Table 1—Summary of Voted Appropriations
Authorities for 1997-98 ($ millions)
| Vote | Auditor General | 1997-98 Planned Spending | 1997-98 Total Authorities | 1997-98 Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | Program expenditures | 45.1 | 46.1 | 45.9 |
| (S) | Salary of the Auditor General | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| (S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Total Office | 50.7 | 51.7 | 51.5 |
Total Authorities are main estimates plus $1.0 million of supplementary estimates.
Table 2—Comparison of Total Planned Spending with Actual Spending for 1997-98 ($ millions)
| Business Line | FTEs | Operating | Capital | Voted Grants and Contribution | Subtotal: Gross Voted Expenditures | Statutory Grants and Contributions | Total Gross Expenditures | Less: Revenue Credited to the Vote | Total Net Expenditures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legislative Auditing | 540 | 50.3 | - | 0.4 | 50.7 | - | 50.7 | - | 50.7 |
| (Total Authorities) | 540 | 51.3 | - | 0.4 | 51.7 | - | 51.7 | - | 51.7 |
| (Actuals) | 511 | 51.1 | - | 0.4 | 51.5 | - | 51.5 | - | 51.5 |
| Other Revenues and Expenditures Revenue Credited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund |
0.8 | ||||||||
| (Total Authorities) | 0 | ||||||||
| (Actuals) | 0.9 | ||||||||
| Cost of Services Provided by Other Departments | 6.0 | ||||||||
| (Total Authorities) | 6.0 | ||||||||
| (Actuals) | 6.0 | ||||||||
| Net Cost of the Program | 55.9 | ||||||||
| (Total Authorities) | 57.7 | ||||||||
| (Actuals) | 56.6 | ||||||||
|
Notes: Numbers in italics denote Total Authorities for 1997-98 (main and supplementary estimates and other authorities). "Operating" includes contributions to employee benefits plans and the salary of the Auditor General. |
|||||||||
Table 3—Historical Comparison of Total Planned Spending with Actual Spending ($ millions)
| Business Line | Actual 1995-96 |
Actual 1996-97 |
Planned Spending 1997-98 |
Total Authorities 1997-98 |
Actual 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legislative Auditing | 51.0 | 51.0 | 50.7 | 51.7 | 51.5 |
|
Note: Total authorities are main estimates plus supplementary estimates plus other authorities. |
|||||
Table 4—Crosswalk Between Old Resource Allocation and New Allocation
Table 5—Resource Requirements by Organization and Business Line
Table 6—Revenues to the Vote
Tables 4 to 6 are not applicable to the Office of the Auditor General.
Table 7—Revenues to the Consolidated Revenue Fund ($ millions)
| Business Line | Actual 1995-96 |
Actual 1996-97 |
Planned Revenues 1997-98 |
Total Authorities 1997-98 |
Actual 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legislative Auditing | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.9 |
Table 8—Statutory Payments ($ millions)
| Business Line | Actual 1995-96 |
Actual 1996-97 |
Planned Spending 1997-98 |
Total Authorities 1997-98 |
Actual 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legislative Auditing | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Table 9—Transfer Payments ($ millions)
| Business Line | Actual 1995-96 |
Actual 1996-97 |
Planned Spending 1997-98 |
Total Authorities 1997-98 |
Actual 1997-98 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legislative Auditing | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Table 10—Capital Spending by Business Line
Table 11—Capital Projects by Business Line
Table 12—Status of Major Crown Projects
Table 13—Loans, Investments and Advances
Table 14—Revolving Fund Financial Summaries
Table 15—Contingent Liabilities
Tables 10 to 15 are not applicable to the Office of the Auditor General
Table 16—How the Canadian Taxpayer Dollars Were Spent
Details on Net Cost of Program for 1997-98
The outputs of the Office are the various opinions, management letters, and reports on audits and studies resulting from the audit process. The Office allocates net program costs to its outputs. In addition to direct costs, which are allocated to each output based on hours worked, certain of the Office's costs are of an overhead nature: for example, administration, official languages and accommodation. These cannot be directly attributed to our outputs. However, they must ultimately form part of the costs of our outputs. Accordingly, the Office has developed a cost accounting system that also allocates overhead to our outputs. Thus, the cost associated with each output is a "fully loaded" cost; in aggregate these total the net program cost of the Office.
1997-98 Audit Costs and (Hours) by Audit Type
1. Federal Government Organizations
a. Departments, Agencies and Special Audits
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency | 11 | (0.1) | 11 | (0.1) | ||
| Canada Space Agency | 16 | (0.1) | 16 | (0.1) | ||
| Canadian International Development Agency | 68 | (0.9) | 5 | (0.1) | 73 | (1.0) |
| Correctional Service Canada | 34 | (0.5) | 34 | (0.5) | ||
| Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food | 299 | (3.7) | 642 | (6.2) | 941 | (9.9) |
| Department of Canadian Heritage | 21 | (0.3) | 21 | (0.3) | ||
| Department of Finance | 200 | (2.8) | 185 | (1.4) | 385 | (4.2) |
| Department of Fisheries & Oceans | 29 | (0.5) | 1,049 | (9.7) | 1,078 | (10.2) |
| Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade | 54 | (0.7) | 54 | (0.6) | 108 | (1.3) |
| Department of Human Resources Development | 123 | (1.5) | 1,513 | (14.3) | 1,636 | (15.8) |
| Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development | 93 | (1.2) | 529 | (5.1) | 622 | (6.3) |
| Department of Industry | 42 | (0.7) | 902 | (8.3) | 944 | (9.0) |
| Department of Justice | 18 | (0.2) | 10 | (0.1) | 28 | (0.3) |
| Department of Citizenship and Immigration | 18 | (0.2) | 678 | (6.9) | 696 | (7.1) |
| Department of National Defence | 177 | (2.6) | 2,195 | (22.9) | 2,372 | (25.5) |
| Department of Health | 58 | (0.7) | 479 | (4.9) | 537 | (5.6) |
| Department of Revenue | 1,382 | (15.8) | 3,621 | (32.0) | 5,003 | (47.8) |
| Department of Natural Resources | 49 | (0.6) | 48 | (0.4) | 97 | (1.0) |
| Department of Public Works and Government Services | 104 | (1.5) | 696 | (6.4) | 800 | (7.9) |
| Department of the Environment | 13 | (0.2) | 939 | (8.5) | 952 | (8.7) |
| Department of the Solicitor General | 400 | (3.8) | 400 | (3.8) | ||
| Department of Transport | 74 | (0.9) | 932 | (9.4) | 1,006 | (10.3) |
| Department of Western Economic Diversification | 9 | (0.1) | 9 | (0.1) | ||
| Federal Office of Regional Development-Québec | 23 | (0.3) | 23 | (0.3) | ||
| Federal Court of Canada, Tax Court of Canada and Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs | 35 | (0.4) | 35 | (0.4) | ||
| National Energy Board | 34 | (0.4) | 270 | (2.4) | 304 | (2.8) |
| National Film Board | 290 | (3.0) | 290 | (3.0) | ||
| Northern Pipeline Agency | 9 | (0.1) | 9 | (0.1) | ||
| Public Accounts (plan, co-ordinate and report) | 1,540 | (15.7) | 1,540 | (15.7) | ||
| Royal Canadian Mounted Police | 45 | (0.5) | 95 | (0.9) | 140 | (1.4) |
| Statistics Canada | 200 | (2.0) | 200 | (2.0) | ||
| Superintendent of Financial Institutions (Office) | 399 | (3.3) | 399 | (3.3) | ||
| Treasury Board Secretariat | 264 | (2.4) | 264 | (2.4) | ||
| Veterans Affairs | 39 | (0.4) | 167 | (1.2) | 206 | (1.6) |
| Government-Wide and Special Audits | ||||||
| Accountability - Internal Studies | 583 | (5.8) | 583 | (5.8) | ||
| Acquisition Cards - Use and Control | 39 | (0.4) | 39 | (0.4) | ||
| Biodiversity | 220 | (2.3) | 220 | (2.3) | ||
| Climate Change | 788 | (6.7) | 788 | (6.7) | ||
| Counting the Environment In | 415 | (3.3) | 415 | (3.3) | ||
| Crown Corporations | 148 | (1.0) | 148 | (1.0) | ||
| Environmental Assessment of Projects in the Federal Government | 528 | (5.4) | 528 | (5.4) | ||
| Expanding Horizons - A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Development Strategies | 300 | (2.0) | 300 | (2.0) | ||
| Financial Management and Control | 799 | (7.4) | 799 | (7.4) | ||
| Functional Responsibility - Authority Issues | 9 | (0.3) | 9 | (0.3) | ||
| Greening the Government of Canada | 675 | (6.4) | 675 | (6.4) | ||
| Household Goods - Removal Services | 807 | (7.5) | 807 | (7.5) | ||
| Human Resource Management - Downsizing at the Department of National Defence | 2,109 | (19.8) | 2,109 | (19.8) | ||
| Information for Parliament | 393 | (3.6) | 393 | (3.6) | ||
| Information Technology - Development | 12 | (7.2) | 12 | (7.2) | ||
| Information Technology - Electronic Commerce | 124 | (0.9) | 124 | (0.9) | ||
| Information Technology - Financial Information Systems | 153 | (1.4) | 153 | (1.4) | ||
| Information Technology - Preparedness for the Year 2000 | 349 | (3.3) | 349 | (3.3) | ||
| Information Technology - Procurement | 2 | 2 | (0.0) | |||
| Major Capital Projects | 662 | (5.6) | 662 | (5.6) | ||
| Moving Toward Managing for Results | 307 | (3.3) | 307 | (3.3) | ||
| New Realities for the Public Service | 19 | (0.1) | 19 | (0.1) | ||
| Performance Measurement for Sustainable Development Strategies | 259 | (2.3) | 259 | (2.3) | ||
| Protection of Public Assets | 742 | (6.8) | 742 | (6.8) | ||
| Reporting Performance in the Expenditure Management System | 36 | (0.4) | 36 | (0.4) | ||
| Results Measurement | 556 | (5.7) | 556 | (5.7) | ||
| Regulatory Reform | 24 | (0.3) | 24 | (0.3) | ||
| Systems Under Development: Revenue Canada | 8 | (0.1) | 8 | (0.1) | ||
| Systems Under Development: Getting Results | 474 | (4.1) | 474 | (4.1) | ||
| Working Globally - Canada's International Environmental Obligations | 425 | (4.0) | 425 | (4.0) | ||
| Follow-up Audits | 1,763 | (16.5) | 1,763 | (16.5) | ||
| Knowledge of the Business and Service to Audit Entities | 2,190 | (20.5) | 2,190 | (20.5) | ||
| Reports to the House of Commons | 3,121 | (26.7) | 3,121 | (26.7) | ||
| Total Departments, Agencies and Special Audits | $4,872 | (56.2) | $35,346 | (334.7) | $40,218 | (390.9) |
b. Crown Corporations
Financial Audits
Annual audit work conducted in Crown corporations to express an opinion pursuant to section 132 of the Financial Administration Act and annual audit work conducted to express an opinion on corporations exempted pursuant to section 85 of the Financial Administration Act.
Value-for-Money Audits
Special examination work conducted in Crown corporations pursuant to section 138 of the Financial Administration Act and value-for-money audits conducted at the request of corporations exempted pursuant to section 85 of the Financial Administration Act.
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| Atlantic Pilotage Authority | 46 | (0.6) | 154 | (1.5) | 200 | (2.1) |
| Atomic Energy of Canada Limited | 156 | (1.3) | 860 | (6.7) | 1,016 | (8.0) |
| Business Development Bank of Canada | 190 | (1.8) | 230 | (1.8) | 420 | (3.6) |
| Canada Council | 116 | (1.4) | 116 | (1.4) | ||
| Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation | 149 | (1.6) | 149 | (1.6) | ||
| Canada Development Investment Corporation | 31 | (0.2) | 31 | (0.2) | ||
| Canada Lands Company (Vieux-Port de Quebec) Inc. | 11 | (0.1) | 11 | (0.1) | ||
| Canada Lands Company Limited | 125 | (1.0) | 125 | (1.0) | ||
| Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation | 191 | (2.0) | 200 | (1.6) | 391 | (3.6) |
| Canada Museums Construction Corporation Inc. | 10 | (0.1) | 10 | (0.1) | ||
| Canadian Broadcasting Corporation | 488 | (5.1) | 488 | (5.1) | ||
| Canadian Commercial Corporation | 99 | (1.2) | 16 | (0.1) | 115 | (1.3) |
| Canadian Dairy Commission | 93 | (1.2) | 93 | (1.2) | ||
| Canadian Film Board Development Corporation | 109 | (1.0) | 109 | (1.0) | ||
| Canadian Museum of Civilization | 81 | (1.0) | 40 | (0.4) | 121 | (1.4) |
| Canadian Museum of Nature | 105 | (1.2) | 105 | (1.2) | ||
| Cape Breton Development Corporation | 263 | (2.7) | 404 | (3.1) | 667 | (5.8) |
| Defence Construction (1951) Limited | 39 | (0.5) | 204 | (2.0) | 243 | (2.5) |
| Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation | 86 | (0.9) | 86 | (0.9) | ||
| Export Development Corporation | 357 | (3.9) | 9 | (0.1) | 366 | (4.0) |
| Farm Credit Corporation | 354 | (3.2) | 96 | (0.7) | 450 | (3.9) |
| Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation | 104 | (1.2) | 104 | (1.2) | ||
| Great Lakes Pilotage Authority Ltd. | 44 | (0.5) | 184 | (1.4) | 228 | (1.9) |
| International Development Research Centre | 86 | (1.0) | 86 | (1.0) | ||
| Laurentian Pilotage Authority | 63 | (0.7) | 4 | 67 | (0.7) | |
| Marine Atlantic Inc. | 225 | (2.3) | 225 | (2.3) | ||
| National Arts Centre Corporation | 111 | (1.4) | 297 | (2.7) | 408 | (4.1) |
| National Capital Commission | 210 | (2.4) | 404 | (3.5) | 614 | (5.9) |
| National Gallery of Canada | 63 | (0.8) | 63 | (0.8) | ||
| National Museum of Science & Technology | 66 | (0.9) | 66 | (0.9) | ||
| Old Port of Montreal Corporation Inc. | 110 | (1.2) | 110 | (1.2) | ||
| Pacific Pilotage Authority | 34 | (0.4) | 34 | (0.4) | 68 | (0.8) |
| Petro Canada Limited | 12 | (0.1) | 12 | (0.1) | ||
| Queens Quay West Land Corporation | 37 | (0.3) | 37 | (0.3) | ||
| Royal Canadian Mint | 287 | (3.6) | 287 | (3.6) | ||
| Standards Council of Canada | 37 | (0.4) | 37 | (0.4) | ||
| The Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated | 71 | (0.7) | 71 | (0.7) | ||
| The Seaway International Bridge Corp. Ltd | 24 | (0.3) | 24 | (0.3) | ||
| The St. Lawrence Seaway Authority Ltd | 156 | (1.7) | 1 | 157 | (1.7) | |
| Via Rail Canada Inc. | 170 | (1.9) | 435 | (3.7) | 605 | (5.6) |
| Treasury Board Quarterly Reports | 15 | (0.2) | 15 | (0.2) | ||
| Total Crown Corporations | $5,024 | (54.0) | $3,572 | (29.7) | $8,596 | (83.7) |
c. Other Corporations and Entities
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| Agriculture Products Board | 2 | (0.0) | 2 | (0.0) | ||
| Atomic Energy Control Board | 35 | (0.5) | 35 | (0.5) | ||
| Canada Pension Plan Account and Canada Pension Plan Investment Fund | 376 | (4.6) | 376 | (4.6) | ||
| Canada Labour Relations Board | 788 | (8.7) | 788 | (8.7) | ||
| Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety | 43 | (0.4) | 43 | (0.4) | ||
| Canadian Food Inspection Agency | 45 | (0.6) | 23 | (0.2) | 68 | (0.8) |
| Canadian Grain Commission | 13 | (0.1) | 13 | (0.1) | ||
| Canadian Human Rights Commission | 577 | (5.7) | 577 | (5.7) | ||
| Canadian Polar Commission | 11 | (0.1) | 11 | (0.1) | ||
| Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board | 14 | (0.2) | 14 | (0.2) | ||
| Exchange Fund Account | 77 | (0.9) | 77 | (0.9) | ||
| Government Annuities Account | 56 | (0.6) | 56 | (0.6) | ||
| International Centre for Human Rights & Democracy | 67 | (0.7) | 3 | 70 | (0.7) | |
| Market Development Incentive Payments | 11 | (0.1) | 11 | (0.1) | ||
| Medical Research Council | 20 | (0.2) | 20 | (0.2) | ||
| National Battlefields Commission | 34 | (0.3) | 34 | (0.3) | ||
| National Research Council of Canada | 7 | (0.1) | 7 | (0.1) | ||
| National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy | 13 | (0.2) | 13 | (0.2) | ||
| Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council | 37 | (0.5) | 37 | (0.5) | ||
| Nunavut Implementation Commission | 55 | (0.5) | 55 | (0.5) | ||
| Patented Medicine Prices Review Board | 177 | (2.1) | 177 | (2.1) | ||
| Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Dependants) Fund | 7 | (0.1) | 7 | (0.1) | ||
| Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council | 28 | (0.4) | 28 | (0.4) | ||
| Employment Insurance Account | 255 | (2.8) | 255 | (2.8) | ||
| Total Other Corporations and Entities | $1,206 | (13.9) | $1,568 | (16.7) | $2,774 | (30.6) |
d. Requests from the Minister of Finance
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| Child Tax Benefit | 34 | (0.4) | 34 | (0.4) | ||
| Debt Servicing Reduction Account | 23 | (0.3) | 23 | (0.3) | ||
| Provincial Income Tax - Opinion to the Minister | 580 | (6.4) | 580 | (6.4) | ||
| Total Requests from Minister of Finance | $637 | (7.1) | $637 | (7.1) | ||
2. Territorial Organizations
a. Departments and Agencies
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| Northwest Territories | ||||||
| Workers' Compensation Board | 113 | (1.2) | 113 | (1.2) | ||
| Government of Northwest Territories | 504 | (4.9) | 187 | (2.1) | 691 | (7.0) |
| Petroleum Products Revolving Fund | 95 | (1.1) | 95 | (1.1) | ||
| Yukon Territory | ||||||
| Workers' Compensation Fund | 81 | (0.8) | 81 | (0.8) | ||
| Government of Yukon Territory | 280 | (2.9) | 36 | (0.4) | 316 | (3.3) |
| Total Departments and Agencies | $1,073 | (10.9) | $223 | (2.5) | $1,296 | (13.4) |
b. Territorial Corporations
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| Northwest Territories | ||||||
| Aurora College | 47 | (0.5) | 47 | (0.5) | ||
| Nunavut Arctic College | 148 | (1.3) | 148 | (1.3) | ||
| Business Corporation | 65 | (0.8) | 65 | (0.8) | ||
| Development Corporation | 110 | (1.2) | 110 | (1.2) | ||
| Housing Corporation | 109 | (1.0) | 15 | (0.2) | 124 | (1.2) |
| Liquor Commission | 29 | 29 | (0.0) | |||
| Power Corporation | 202 | (2.0) | 202 | (2.0) | ||
| Yukon Territory | ||||||
| Development Corporation | 11 | (0.1) | 11 | (0.1) | ||
| Energy Corporation | 42 | (0.2) | 42 | (0.2) | ||
| Housing Corporation | 86 | (0.8) | 5 | (0.1) | 91 | (0.9) |
| Liquor Corporation | 54 | (0.6) | 54 | (0.6) | ||
| Surface Rights Board | 11 | (0.1) | 11 | (0.1) | ||
| Yukon College | 77 | (0.8) | 77 | (0.8) | ||
| Total Territorial Corporations | $991 | (9.4) | $20 | (0.3) | $1,011 | (9.7) |
3. Other Canadian Organizations (Order-in-Council Requests)
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| National Tripartite Stabilization Board | 13 | (0.1) | 13 | (0.1) | ||
| Total Other Canadian Organizations | $13 | (0.1) | $13 | (0.1) | ||
4. International Organizations (Order-in-Council Requests)
| [Both dollars and (hours) are in thousands] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Audits | Value for Money Audits | Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||
| International Civil Aviation Organization | 220 | (4.1) | 83 | (1.3) | 303 | (5.4) |
| United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) | 326 | (3.8) | 446 | (5.2) | 772 | (9.0) |
| Total International Organizations | $546 | (7.9) | $529 | (6.5) | $1,075 | (14.4) |
| Subtotal | $14,362 | (159.5) | $41,258 | (390.4) | $55,620 | (549.9) |
| International Activities | 1,024 | (12.6) | ||||
| Total | $56,644 | (562.5) | ||||
Section V—Supplementary Information
A. Listing of Statutory Reports
| Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons | published periodically and available in a variety of formats, including on the Internet at http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca |
| Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons | published annually and available in a variety of formats, including on the Internet at http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca |
| Auditor General's Opinion and Observations on the Financial Statements of the Government of Canada | published annually in the Public Accounts of Canada, Volume I and available on the Internet at http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/text/pubacc-e.html |
| Opinion on the Condensed Financial Statements of the Government of Canada | published annually in the Annual Financial Report of the Government of Canada |
| Opinions by the Auditor General on some 90 sets of financial statements of parent Crown corporations, federal departmental corporations and other federal entities, territorial governments and organizations, other Canadian entities and international organizations | published in the various statutory reports containing the financial statements of these organizations and Treasury Board's Annual Report to Parliament on Crown Corporations and Other Corporate Interests in Canada |
| Special examinations of Crown corporations | published every five years for each Crown corporation and submitted to the respective boards of directors |
| Annual Report on Other Matters to the Yukon Legislative Assembly and to the Northwest Territories Legislative Assembly | published annually and available from the Clerk of the respective assemblies |
B. Contacts for Further Information
Office of the Auditor General240 Sparks Street
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K1A 0G6
(613) 995-3708
FAX (613) 957-4023
Internet: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/
Communications
Johanne McDuff, Director
Audit Operations Branch
Raymond Dubois, Deputy Auditor General
Corporate Services Branch
Michael J. McLaughlin, Deputy Auditor General and Senior Financial Officer
Environment and Sustainable Development
Brian Emmett, Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
