This Web page has been archived on the Web.

2000 October Report of the Auditor General of Canada

October 2000 Report—Chapter 10

Exhibit 10.3—Six Key Components of the Policy Framework for Airport Transfers

1987 - Guiding Principles (LAAs)

Some examples:

  • No increase in funding by the government
  • Authorities subject to the Federal Competition Act
  • Not-for-profit corporation
  • Authorities to operate under terms and conditions of the operating certificate and under the safety and security regulations
  • Government to get a reasonable compensation for any facility transferred
  • Many others

1989 - Supplementary Principles (LAAs)

Some examples:

  • Airports to be leased on a long-term basis and valued on the basis of fair market value with consideration of potential earnings
  • As a general rule, authorities to be self-sufficient
  • Authorities to operate at arm's length from government without financial recourse to it
  • Board members must be Canadians, nominated by municipal governments and other parties such as chambers of commerce and boards of trade
  • Airports to be operated with flexibility, efficiency and affordability by local community representatives to ensure better accountability to public
  • Many others

1990 to 1998 - Other Government Directions (LAAs & CAAs)

Some examples:

  • Airport transfers should continue to reflect the principles of equity, consistency, uniformity and fairness
  • Five-year performance review
  • Requirement for self-sufficiency is deferred for some airports via renegotiation of leases
  • Federal government be no worse off
  • Blanket authority to negotiate 16 transfer deals without airport-specific Treasury Board approval
  • Specific components of lease can be negotiated or are predetermined and fixed
  • Renegotiate after five years if minimum passenger level not met (only for one airport)
  • Reopen long-term agreements to provide financial support at viable airports
  • Many others

1994 - National Airports Policy (CAAs)

Some examples:

  • Federal government to maintain its role as regulator
  • Federal government to retain ownership of the 26 NAS airports and guarantee the integrity and long-term viability of the System
  • ·Airports to meet the needs of users and their communities they serve
  • Current levels of service adjusted to meet demand and existing user fees to be applied more widely
  • As a general rule, authorities to be self-sufficient five years after transfer
  • Many others

1994 - Public Accountability Principles (CAAs)

Some examples:

  • Not-for-profit corporation
  • Board of Directors includes two or three federal nominees
  • Equitable access to all carriers
  • Reasonable user charges
  • Engage in activities consistent with its purpose
  • General practice to tender contracts
  • Declarations of business activities to avoid real or perceived conflict of interest
  • Community consultations
  • Many others

1994 - Fundamental Principles for the Creation and Operation of Canadian Airport Authorities (CAAs)

Some examples:

  • Airports to be leased on a long-term basis
  • The financial terms of the airport transfer to the authority to result in fair value for the federal government with appropriate consideration to the airport's future earning potential
  • As a general rule, authorities to be self-sufficient
  • Authorities to operate at arm's length from government, consistent with the long-term lease, without any further recourse to the federal government
  • Board members to be Canadians, nominated by federal, provincial and municipal governments and other parties such as chambers of commerce and boards of trade
  • Airports to be operated with flexibility, efficiency and affordability by local community representatives to ensure better accountability to public.
  • Many others