This Web page has been archived on the Web.
2005 November Report of the Auditor General of Canada
November 2005 Report—Chapter 1
Exhibit 1.9—Our assessment of community tripartite agreement commitments
|
Commitments |
Performance |
Our assessment |
|---|---|---|
|
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada assigns appropriate number of peace officers. |
|
The RCMP fills community tripartite agreement (CTA) positions for which it is funded, but this is often insufficient to meet CTA commitments. |
|
Peace officers are required to serve a community with 100 percent of their duty time. |
|
More than 40 percent of assigned peace officers' files originated outside of the community. |
|
Assigned officers are required to be physically present on community 80 percent of the time. |
|
Determined mostly by location of detachment relative to community. |
|
Best efforts for RCMP peace officers to be culturally compatible. |
|
Most community leaders we spoke with identified positive or improving relations with the peace officers assigned. |
|
The RCMP needs to consult band chief and council regarding who is assigned. |
|
In some communities, the band chief and council are consulted while in others they are not. |
|
Peace officers need to enforce certain band bylaws. |
|
Peace officers generally do not enforce band bylaws. |
|
The RCMP needs to provide monthly status reports and special reports upon request. |
|
Some communities were provided with meaningful reports while others received reports that were less so. Reports were not always done on a monthly basis and did not report on the extent to which CTA commitments were being implemented. |
fully complies
partially complies
does not comply
