This Web page has been archived on the Web.

1991 Report of the Auditor General of Canada

Main Points

21.1 Under section 11 of the Auditor General Act, at the request of the Governor in Council, the Office has received orders-in-council to inquire into and report on 10 organizations (paragraphs 21.11 and 21.12).

21.2 The Office provides a variety of services to meet the needs of Members of Parliament (21.14 to 21.22).

21.3 Employment equity concerns are being addressed by the Office (21.26 to 21.29).

21.4 The Program Evaluation and Internal Audit Group serves the Auditor General directly to ensure that the Office obtains good value for money in its own expenditures (21.32).

21.5 The Office has made progress in the development of its methodology, which includes the new Comprehensive Auditing Manual (21.37 and 21.38).

21.6 Investment in new technology has provided an environment for the cost-effective exercise of professional judgment in the planning, execution and reporting of audits (21.47 to 21.52).

21.7 The Office is the secretariat to the INTOSAI Development Initiative, a training program of the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, and participates in a program funded by the Canadian International Development Agency to expose international Fellows to Canadian legislative auditing (21.56 to 21.60).

21.8 The Office completed special examinations of three Crown corporations in 1990-91 (21.61 to 21.64).

The Work of the Office

21.9 The legislative mandate for the activities of the Office comes from the Auditor General Act and the Financial Administration Act. Section 7.1 of the Auditor General Act requires that the Auditor General "shall report annually to the House of Commons on the work of his Office." The preceding chapters of this report describe the results of audit work completed by the Office during the past year. Other work of the Office is the subject of this chapter.

Products Required by Legislation

21.10 The two most visible products of the Office's work are the annual report to the House of Commons and the Auditor General's annual opinion on the financial statements of the Government of Canada. Other products are the result of substantial effort devoted to audit work to support opinions on:

  • the financial statements of over 100 Crown corporations and government agencies;
  • special examinations of Crown corporations where the Auditor General is the appointed auditor;
  • annual attest and value-for-money audits for the governments of the Yukon and Northwest Territories; and
  • other work under section 11 of the Auditor General Act.

Section 11 of the Auditor General Act

21.11 Section 11 of the Auditor General Act provides authority for the Office to carry out activities in addition to those explicitly specified in the Auditor General Act and the Financial Administration Act. If, in his opinion, doing so does not interfere with his primary responsibilities, the Auditor General may inquire into and report on other matters at the request of the Governor in Council.

21.12 As part of its ongoing efforts to finalize arrangements for activities not specifically provided for by the Act, the Office has received orders-in-council pursuant to section 11 relating to the:

  • International Civil Aviation Agency
  • North Atlantic Treaty Organization
  • International Atomic Energy Agency
  • International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions Development Initiative
  • United Nations Development Program
  • National Energy Board Cost Recovery
  • Fisheries Prices Support Board
  • Self-supporting Airports and Associated Ground Services Revolving Fund
  • National Film Board
  • International Fisheries Commission Pension Society

Organization of the Office

21.13 Exhibit 21.1 is an overview of the organizational structure of the Office showing the functions of the two branches and the Executive Office.

Parliamentary Liaison

Serving Parliament
21.14 The Auditor General is a servant of Parliament. He is independent of the government of the day and provides support to all Members of Parliament in an objective fashion and without regard to partisan interests.

21.15 The range of services provided to Parliament is broad and covers a variety of products, from the annual report to letters responding to requests for information about reported matters from individual MPs and Senators. This section outlines the various services provided to parliamentarians, along with other activities undertaken during the fiscal year ended 31 March 1991.

Responding to parliamentary requests
21.16 During the year, the Auditor General receives requests from Members of Parliament. These usually come in the form of a letter containing certain information or raising a point of view and asking the Auditor General to look into the matter. All of these requests are reviewed personally by the Auditor General, and an appropriate response is developed in consultation with the audit Principal responsible for the organization that the request concerns. Where the matter has potential significance and is within the scope of the Auditor General's mandate, it is included in audit work under way or planned.

21.17 The Auditor General Act requires that matters of significance be brought to the attention of Parliament in the Auditor General's annual report. For this reason, the practice of the Auditor General is to include any findings in his next annual report, rather than report to the member or committee making the request.

21.18 During the 1990-91 fiscal year, the Auditor General received 18 such requests to look into a range of matters, varying from the failure of an Indian band to pay an auditor's bill to the disposition of the Harbourfront land in Toronto. Members of three major political parties were represented in the requests. The disposition of these requests is outlined in Exhibit 21.2 .

21.19 As Exhibit 21.2 shows, the majority of parliamentary requests are acted on in a positive and direct manner in the course of the regular audit work of the Office. Those beyond the scope of the Office's work usually are matters of a nature that would require the Auditor General to comment on government policy. It should be noted that Exhibit 21.2 does not include requests that may be delivered informally in conversation with the Auditor General; nor does it include those that may be set out in the course of parliamentary proceedings, including specific recommendations of parliamentary committees. For example, almost every report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PAC) contains a recommendation that the Office carry out some form of assessment of departmental responses to PAC report recommendations. All of these are followed up by the Office.

21.20 The Office devotes considerable effort to monitoring the proceedings of Parliament in order to maintain an awareness of the interests and concerns of its primary client. For this reason, requests from individual Members to consider specific matters are taken seriously as a direct expression of client concerns.

Electronic data processing services to Parliament
21.21 In recent years, the Office has made the annual report available in electronic form. The standard electronic data processing (EDP) package has been a copy of the current year's report on a disc that is compatible with the EDP equipment in MP's offices. It contains a text search capability that enables a member's staff to quickly search the entire contents of the report, using key words, for matters of interest to the MP. This year, the basic package was enhanced by the addition of an EDP version on compact disc of annual reports from the last 10 years. The compact disc is available through the Library of Parliament. (See photograph )

Video services
21.22 As in the past several years, highlights of the 1991 Report are summarized in a short video presentation. This video is available on Parliament's OASIS network after the report is tabled. In addition, copies of the video are available from the Office in either official language, for constituency or other uses.

Audit Operations

21.23 The audit work of the Office is conducted by the Audit Operations Branch. A typical group in Audit Operations is responsible for a mixture of departments, agencies, Crown corporations and functional operations. One audit group specializes in Crown corporations, providing advice and methodology to the other groups. Another manages the opinion on the summary financial statements of Canada, consolidating information from departmental audit teams. A third group provides expertise in the area of computer audit.

21.24 Audit Operations includes two regional groups. There are regional offices in Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Montreal and Halifax. The regional offices contain 17.2 percent of the Audit Operations staff and are responsible for a full range of audit products in their regions.

Professional and Administrative Services Branch

Financial records
21.25 Administrative Services maintains financial records on the appropriations and expenditures of the Office. Comparative information is provided in Exhibit 21.3 .

Employment equity
21.26 Employment equity seeks to assist persons with disabilities, members of visible minorities, aboriginal peoples and women by providing programs designed to remedy problems of employment discrimination in the Canadian workplace. Policy guidelines for this government initiative were provided by the Treasury Board in 1983. Under the current policy, departments are required to prepare affirmative action plans outlining specific targets for each group. As a separate employer, the Office is not required to prepare such plans but has chosen to do so in keeping with good management practices.

21.27 The Office of the Auditor General has an Employment Equity Committee that meets every two months. Its membership represents both branches of the Office. A working group in the Office has been responsible for a program to employ people who have disabilities, which has substantially increased their employment participation in the Office. This working group also addresses employment equity concerns for women, aboriginal peoples and visible minorities.

21.28 The Office has an Employment Equity Co-ordinator, and an Employment Equity Action Guide that serves as a tool for planning and control. The Office's approach to employment equity is not to give preferential treatment to particular groups, but rather to break down any barriers to their employment. The purpose of this approach is to ensure that all persons have an equal opportunity to be hired and promoted. For people with disabilities the Office makes sure that there are no physical barriers to impede their performance in the workplace.

21.29 A number of approaches are used to ensure that all groups covered by the program are aware of available employment opportunities. For example, the Office consults with guidance officers at universities. It also works with some Indian bands to make them aware of employment opportunities in the Office. Working group members also meet on specific issues with representatives of the various groups.

Education and professional associations
21.30 Among the professional staff there are 559 degrees from post-secondary educational institutions. The majority of these degrees (182) are in accounting and business-related studies - Bachelor of Commerce and Master of Business Administration, for example. Other degrees cover a wide range of studies and include 12 PhDs. All formally granted educational degrees are from recognized educational institutions.

21.31 A similarly high level of representation is evident in the professional designations in the Office. A total of 294 staff members are certified Chartered Accountants, General Accountants, Management Accountants or Professional Engineers. The Office encourages all staff members to upgrade their education through outside studies whenever possible.

Program Evaluation and Internal Audit Group

21.32 This group serves the Auditor General directly. It informs him on how well the Office is doing its job and, if opportunities are available, on how to do it better. This helps the Auditor General to make certain that the taxpayers get maximum value for money from his Office.

The group provides management information on the performance of the Office that is not readily available elsewhere. Last year the group concentrated on the following three important areas:

  • how the Auditor General's annual report could be made more effective;
  • whether the financial auditing standards have been complied with;
  • how well the Office interacts with government departments and, if needed, what opportunities exist for improvement.
Increasing the effectiveness of the annual report
21.33 During the year, the proceedings of the Symposium on Communicating Audit Information in the Nineties (SCAN) were published and circulated throughout the audit and legislative communities. These proceedings took the form of prescriptions for the successful communication of legislative audit information. They captured the experience and expertise of a wide representation of North American and European legislative auditors, legislators, public service managers, media people and communications experts. Several of the prescriptions have been adopted by the Office and also by a number of provincial legislative audit offices.

Quality of financial auditing
21.34 A large part of the audit resources of the Office is dedicated to attesting to the financial statements of Crown corporations and other entities, and the Public Accounts. It is imperative that this audit work be of unassailable quality. It was determined, during the year, that this work complied with the Office's quality standards.

Interaction with government departments
21.35 Audit efficiency is somewhat dependent on the relationship between auditors and departmental officials. The Office needs insight into how audit teams interact with government entities, and how the entities view these interactions. During the year, interim reports were issued on the following:

  • how audit teams get a working knowledge of the entity for the purpose of deciding what to audit - this analysis revealed some effective practices by individual audit teams that could be more widely used by the Office;
  • how audit teams develop rapport with the entity when beginning an audit, when communicating audit progress, and when clearing results; and
  • how audit team leaders brief the Office of the Comptroller General of Canada on their audit findings.
21.36 A final report in this series will describe how the audited entities view all aspects of these interactions. It will also capture their suggestions for improvement.

Methodology Development

21.37 The Methodology Development Committee manages the development of professional standards for the work of the Office. Under its direction, members of the staff research, test and publish policy positions and related guidance. These determine the quality standards of the Office, which are approved by the Methodology Development Committee. The Committee is supported by the Professional Practices Group. Exhibit 21.4 summarizes the activities co-ordinated by the Committee during 1990-91.

21.38 The most significant achievement in the year was the publication and implementation of the Office's revised Comprehensive Auditing Manual. This marks an important step forward for the Office's methodology. It reflects in one volume the lessons learned over more than a decade of comprehensive auditing. It thus provides a more complete framework within which the Office's professional staff can exercise the judgment and initiative required in value-for-money auditing. The manual not only reflects a more mature methodology but also signals a greater degree of discipline in our work than was feasible in the pioneering days of comprehensive auditing. (See photograph )

Planning future methodology
21.39 While our methodology is more mature, it is not perfect or static. The Office adjusts its audit methodologies to reflect not only lessons learned from past experience but also the results of research and standard setting by various professional bodies.

21.40 Perhaps most important, the Office's audit methodologies respond to changes in the control and accountability relationship between Parliament and government. This is because many questions about audit methodology are, at their roots, really questions about parliamentary control and accountability. Where expectations, responsibility and accountability are unclear, audits are difficult to perform. Legislative auditing serves the accountability and control relationship between Parliament and government.

21.41 It would be unrealistic for the Office to try to develop its audit methodologies in isolation, because of the close relationship between audit and the accountability relationship it serves. Many questions have concerned the practitioners and observers of comprehensive auditing since it was first introduced in the federal government by the late James Macdonell. They include, for example:

  • What results are important, and how accurately and precisely can we (and should we) measure them?
  • Which types of audit, study and investigation that have emerged in practice best serve the accountability relationship between government and Parliament?
  • How do audit methodologies reflect and respect the nature of responsibilities at different levels in the accountability chain, and the involvement of different levels of government?
  • How can we ensure that audit conclusions are fair and consistent among audits conducted in various government departments at various times?
21.42 These are not easy questions. Accordingly, the Methodology Development Committee has launched consultations with elected and appointed officials and with professional colleagues who have also grappled with these issues. The purpose of the consultations is to prepare a strategic plan for continuing to develop the Office's methodology.

21.43 The results will help establish whether and how the Office can do its work in ways that will better help Parliament and government to improve the control and accountability relationship that the Office serves.

Professional Development Activities

21.44 Professional development activities are essential to maintaining the professional competence of an audit office, and to ensuring a constant flow of qualified staff and state-of-the-art methodology.

21.45 During 1990-91 the Office's Professional Development Group:

  • presented 85 different courses internally in 191 offerings, for a total of 3,640 training days;
  • funded 591 days of external training; and
  • provided approximately 1,200 days of professional conference attendance.
21.46 All of the above amounts to more than 5,400 days of professional development activities. This represents an average of 8.7 days for every staff member.

Technology

21.47 The Office has made significant investments based on a technology strategy over the last decade, including about $1 million each year for computer development. The primary purpose of this investment has been to "empower the individual" by providing flexible and easy-to-use tools that both support the professional auditor and provide the necessary flexibility to adapt to a changing auditing environment. These tools enable auditors to cost-effectively exercise their professional judgment in the planning, execution and reporting of audits.

21.48 The second purpose of the investment is to focus on the importance of the team and the group in auditing. The ability to work together and share information is critical to the success of our audits. Therefore, it is imperative that we provide tools for the auditor to easily store, manipulate and retrieve shared information. Facilitating individual creativity in a team environment requires us to look at communications and applications that bring teams and groups together. This is a particular priority for our regional and field offices. Video and teleconferencing, voicemail, and high speed computer access to the head office will be investigated and implemented where cost effective.

21.49 The technological environment of the Office has continued to change dramatically with the further development of:

  • IDEA - Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis a software package that allows an auditor to enter a client's data into a micro-computer and manipulate it with ease and flexibility. A new version, 4.0, whose development was supported by the Office along with major accounting firms in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, has been released by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
  • The ATTEST system - a data base application used as a tool in the audit of the Public Accounts required under section 6 of the Auditor General Act. Audit teams input the results of their audits of departmental accounts; the ATTEST system consolidates these results and facilitates their numerical processing by the Central Team responsible for the Public Accounts.
  • Publication of the OAG audit data base on CD-ROM - an electronically searchable repository of accounting and auditing reference material. It contains public sector audit information from a number of countries, including the United States, Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand. (See photograph )
21.50 In early 1991 the Office began to bring a new management information system on line - the MIS2000, started in the fall of 1988. This replaces a system used since 1982. The MIS2000 is intended to meet the Office's needs into the next century. The implementation of the MIS2000 demanded that all staff have high speed electronic access to the central mini-computer.

21.51 The first applications implemented on the MIS2000 were intended to facilitate the management of the audit process, but the system has also created opportunities to develop and implement other team and group processes. One such achievement is the provision of access to the OAG audit data base through the corporate system. Not only will this mechanism eliminate the need for most auditors to have CD-ROM drives, it will also allow additions to the data base to be accessible to auditors as soon as the information is prepared or received.

21.52 MIS2000 is, therefore, more than a management information system; it is the beginning of a comprehensive corporate information management system.

Official Languages

21.53 The Office strives in its day-to-day operations to fully reflect its commitment to maintaining a sufficient level of bilingual resources to perform its work in both official languages. This commitment enables the Office to communicate with the public and to conduct audits in English or French, and to provide employees with equal opportunities to perform their duties in the language of their choice.

21.54 The Office has continued its efforts to improve the second-language skills of its employees. Over the last fiscal year, 94 employees benefited from French language training and 37 from English language training. The Second Language Evaluation Test was administered to 120 candidates.

21.55 The Commissioner of Official Languages noted in his last annual report that the OAG "has improved the quality of its services in both official languages." This progress has been achieved despite the fact that "it still has a number of problems to solve with respect to language of work and the equitable participation of both language groups."

International Programs

INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI)
21.56 IDI is a training program of the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) established in 1986. Its secretariat is presently attached to the Auditor General of Canada.

21.57 As of December 1990, IDI had sponsored 31 workshops for 694 people from 105 participating Supreme Audit Institutions, who contributed 67 resource persons to the program. IDI has published an International Directory of Information for Audit Training, which is distributed in five languages to all of its 158 member institutions. The directory contains 90 course outlines contributed by 17 Supreme Audit Institutions, training models, case studies and an inventory of microcomputer software for audit purposes.

21.58 IDI has an annual operating budget of approximately $1.2 million provided by various national and international aid agencies. The Canadian International Development Agency was among IDI's first supporters. Other contributors are the Asian Development Bank, the Commonwealth Secretariat, the Finnish International Development Agency, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Japan International Cooperation Agency, the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Development Cooperation and the United Nations Development Program.

International Audit Office Assistance Program
21.59 The Office is pleased with the success of the International Audit Office Assistance Program, funded by the Canadian International Development Agency through a non-governmental organization - the Canadian Comprehensive Audit Foundation. The program provides fellowships to senior legislative auditors from developing countries. It gives them an opportunity to spend one year in a Canadian environment in which they become exposed to advanced techniques in public sector auditing. In most cases, the Fellows spend their year working with this Office. (See photograph )

21.60 This year marks the eleventh anniversary of the program; so far 41 countries have participated, sending more than 95 Fellows to Ottawa.

Special Examinations of Crown Corporations

21.61 Pursuant to section 132 of the Financial Administration Act (FAA), where it is the appointed auditor the Office must provide an annual audit report on each parent Crown corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries. This report includes an opinion on their financial statements and an opinion on compliance with specified authorities. It may also include reporting on any other matter deemed significant. Section 147 of the FAA requires that the Office report the "fully loaded" costs of preparing these annual audit reports on Crown corporations (see Exhibit 21.5 ).

21.62 Section 138 of the FAA requires that, at least once every five years, each parent Crown corporation named in Schedule III of the FAA undergo a special examination. This requirement is distinct from the requirement for annual audits of financial statements.

21.63 The objective of a special examination is to determine whether a corporation's financial and management control and information systems, and its management practices, can provide reasonable assurance that:

  • assets have been safeguarded and controlled;
  • financial, human and physical resources have been managed economically and efficiently; and
  • operations have been carried out effectively.
In 1990-91 the Office completed three special examinations. The "fully loaded" costs of these special examinations were:

Canadian Museums Construction Corporation

$550,340

Canadian Saltfish Corporation

$312,330

International Centre for Ocean Development

$422,550


21.64 At the end of the 1990-91 fiscal year, only one special examination (Farm Credit Corporation) was in progress; it is expected to be completed during 1991-92.